![]() Today, Padadopoulos is unsure that those messages came from the person he met in the cafe. The woman and the adviser exchanged frequent messages in the weeks that followed. On March 24, one of the members the Trump foreign policy team, George Papadopoulos, sat in the cafe of an upscale London hotel with a Russian woman who introduced herself as Putin’s niece and offered to help set up a meeting between the Russian president and Trump. Meanwhile, Unit 26165 was poring over the bounty from a separate attack it had just carried out: 50,000 emails stolen from the Clinton campaign’s chairman. On March 21 in Washington, Trump announced his foreign policy team, a group of fringe figures whose advocacy of warmer relations with Russia ran counter to Republican orthodoxy. Petersburg, shift workers posted on Facebook and Twitter at a feverish pace, posing as Americans and following instructions to attack Clinton. On March 15 of that year, Trump won five primaries, closing in on his party’s nomination, and crowed that he had become “the biggest political story anywhere in the world." That same day in Moscow, a veteran hacker named Ivan Yermakov, a Russian military intelligence officer working for a secret outfit called Unit 26165, began probing the computer network of the Democratic National Committee. In an election with an extraordinarily close margin, the repeated disruption of the Clinton campaign by emails published on WikiLeaks and the anti-Clinton, pro-Trump messages shared with millions of voters by Russia could have made the difference, a possibility Trump flatly rejects.Īs Trump emerged in spring 2016 as the improbable favorite for the Republican nomination, the Russian operation accelerated on three fronts - the hacking and leaking of Democratic documents massive fraud on Facebook and Twitter and outreach to Trump campaign associates.Ĭonsider 10 days in March. For Putin, however, it was long-overdue payback, a justified response to years of “provocations" from the United States.Īnd there is a plausible case that Putin succeeded in delivering the presidency to his admirer, Trump, though it cannot be proved or disproved. To many Americans, the intervention seemed to be a surprise attack, a stealth cyberage Pearl Harbor, carried out by an inexplicably sinister Russia. ![]() ![]() Well-connected Russians worked aggressively to recruit or influence people inside the Trump campaign. Acting on the personal animus of Putin, public and private instruments of Russian power moved with daring and skill to harness the currents of American politics. President Trump’s Twitter outbursts that it is all a “hoax" and a “witch hunt," in the face of a mountain of evidence to the contrary, have taken a toll on public comprehension.īut to travel back to 2016 and trace the major plotlines of the Russian attack is to underscore what we now know with certainty: The Russians carried out a landmark intervention that will be examined for decades to come. What Robert Mueller, the special counsel in charge of the investigation, may know or may yet discover is still uncertain. The banners may well have been intended as visual victory laps for the most effective foreign interference in an American election in history.įor many Americans, the Trump-Russia story as it has been voluminously reported over the past two years is a confusing tangle of unfamiliar names and cyberjargon, further obscured by the shout-fest of partisan politics. The Kremlin, it appeared, had reached onto US soil in New York and Washington.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |